Pillar 3a comparison: The best 3a providers in test 1

Pillar 3a comparison 2026:

The best 3a providers in the test

Who at a young age wrong pillar 3a choice can quickly lose tens of thousands of francs by the time they retire. Yes, you read that right.

The Swiss market for digital Pillar 3a solutions is growing steadily, and the most affordable providers now differ by only a few hundredths. Nevertheless, the choice made today will determine four- to five-figure sums over the course of decades.

As at autumn 2026 we have compared all relevant digital pillar 3a providers. With Real money tests and the weaknesses that are not in any brochure.

We don't rate according to fees alone. But according to what is really worthwhile in the long term.

So let's start with an overview!

Pillar 3a comparison: 7 digital providers, as at October 2026
7 providers comparedOur choicefinpensionfindependentVIACTrue WealthfranklyneonYuh
Fees per year0.39 to 0.42 %0.29 %up to approx. 0.44 %only on invested assets0.12 to 0.21 %Fund costs, management 0 %0.45 %0.43 % All-in plus fund costs0.38 to 0.44 %plus approximately 0.03 % fund costs, which decrease as assets grow0.50 %All-in
Equity allocation0 to 99 %20 to 99 %0 to 99 %0 to 99 %15 to 95 %plus cash option25 to 99 %20 to 99 %
Staggered withdrawalUp to 5 accountsUp to 5 accountsUp to 5 accountsUp to 5 accountsUp to 5 accountsUp to 5 accountsJust 1 account
Minimum depositCHF 1CHF 1CHF 1CHF 1,000CHF 1CHF 1CHF 10
Early withdrawal for home purchaseCHF 250CHF 500CHF 300except where a mortgage is taken out with VIACCHF 250Free of chargeCHF 400CHF 400
Other products
  • Vested benefits
  • Private investing
  • Private investing
  • Vested benefits
  • Insurance
  • Mortgage
  • Private investing
  • Vested benefits
  • Vested benefits
  • ZKB offers
  • Banking
  • neon invest
  • Banking
  • Invest
  • Youth account
Pension foundationfinpension3a Pension foundationfindependent3a pension foundation, custodian bank ZKBBank WIRTerzo pension foundationBLKB3a Digital Pension foundationZKBSparen 3 Pension foundationSimply3aCustodian Bank Lienhardt & PartnerSimply3aCustodian Bank Lienhardt & Partner
Stand-out featureWide range of funds, which can be freely combinedWithholding tax-optimised funds for the USA and JapanOptional cover in the event of death or disabilityAutomatic staggering, 3a and 3b alignedVested benefits with the same providerRight in the neon appEverything in the Yuh app
Keep in mindStandard strategies comprising around 40 % Swiss equitiesEarly withdrawal for a home costs CHF 500More expensive than True Wealth and FindependentA strategy for 3a and personal assets combinedIssue and redemption fees on every purchase and saleNo pension funds optimised for withholding taxJust one account, no pension funds optimised for withholding tax
PromotionCHF 25VoucherCHF 2'000Permanently free of charge, code «schwiizer3a»Invite friendsCHF 100Bonus on disposable assets, code CHFRANKECHF 35Voucher- –- –
Ideal forA separate strategy for each objective; funds can be chosen freelyLow-cost and tax-optimised fundsWide choice, with optional risk coverLowest costs, one strategy for everythingIt’s easy, with ZKB behind youAnyone who already uses neonAnyone who already uses Yuh
Test reportRead reviewRead reviewRead reviewRead reviewRead reviewRead reviewRead review

Fees per year, including fund costs (TER), unless otherwise stated. You can read about how we compare and test products further down.

Fees: excluding target fund fees for property funds. Several providers incorporate an indirect Swiss property fund into strategies under 99% equities. Depending on the unit, this then adds around 0.03% to 0.07% per year.

Note on utilisation: The comparison tables and Schwiizerfranke’s own data analyses on this page are the result of Schwiizerfranke’s own research and are available at Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 licenced. We would be pleased to receive a link if you cite the data.

Difference to the Kassensturz test

Many people are looking for the 3a fund winner. Our approach is slightly different: we not only weigh up fees, but also flexibility, staggered withdrawal, equity ratio, fund class and tax practice. That's why the most favourable provider in the pure fee test doesn't automatically have to be the best choice for you.

Table of contents

What you should bear in mind when choosing a pillar 3a provider

When selecting a pillar 3a provider – whether 3a account, 3a funds or securities solution – it is important to know what you want to do with your 3rd pillar intend to do.

As investment strategies can overlap and complement other investments in your discretionary assets, you should Pay attention to the following factors in the 2026 pillar 3a comparison:

 

Does the pillar 3a provider suit my plans?

For example, would you like to save towards a home ownership subsidy and align the 3a investment strategy with the strategy of your free assets (pillar 3b)? Then look out for a provider where this is possible.

Pillar 3a comparison providers pillar 3a test report 3a experience frankly vs viac vs finpension vs true wealth

Which 3a fund and investment strategy would I like to choose?

A 3a account does not fluctuate, but usually offers a deeper expected Return on investment as a broadly diversified investment solution. Long-term investors therefore opt for Pillar 3a fund solutions held in a 3a custody account and invest their long-term Pension assets in Securities.

At Pillar 3a securities comparison It is striking that there is a wide variety of investment strategies to choose from – from Pillar 3a equity funds to sustainable solutions – and the providers can differ drastically. Therefore, ask yourself How you want to invest (e.g. global, with a focus on Switzerland or sustainable and, in particular, how much risk you want to take).

 

Are the pillar 3a fees fair?

The biggest job has already been taken away from you, because all the above supplier have Fair pillar 3a fees. All fees in the above comparison for the best pillar 3a in Switzerland have been carefully checked by Schwiizerfranke and a preselection has already been made for you to simplify the selection.
The differences are usually no longer great, but let's discuss the fees in a little more detail.

Schwiizerfranke professional tip: Several pots from several suppliers

Don't fixate on a single provider. Instead, open several 3a pots with at least two different pension foundations. Two reasons:

1. staggered payment of optimised taxes. On withdrawal, the 3a assets are taxed separately at a progressive rate. If you withdraw everything at once, you pay significantly more. If you stagger 4 pots over 4 years, you break the progression and save four to five figures depending on the volume and canton.

2. more flexibility with advance withdrawals for home ownership. The WEF lock-in period of 5 years applies per pension fund. If you have pots with several providers, you can withdraw money for home ownership more often.

Caution with WEF: The tax authorities often aggregate WEF withdrawals within 5 years when calculating tax. Check with the cantonal tax office beforehand.

Bonus - Bankruptcy protection in the 3a area: In the case of pure 3a savings accounts, bankruptcy privileges apply up to CHF 100,000 per insured person and pension fund. In the case of securities solutions, as offered by all providers in our comparison, the securities are considered special assets of the pension foundation. They are segregated in the event of bankruptcy and do not require separate deposit protection.

Our financial tips for 2026

"Intelligent people learn from the mistakes of others".

We have compiled our top selection for you from all our tests and experience reports:

Pillar 3a fees comparison

Pillar 3a: Overview of total costs (as at July 2026; subject to change in October 2026)
Provider Total costs p.a. Max. Share quota
True Wealth0.12% - 0.21% (0% Management + TER)99%
findependent0.29%99%
finpension0.39% - 0.42%99%
neon0.38% – 0.45% (on a sliding scale)99%
frankly0.43% All-in fee95%
VIACup to approx. 0.44% (only on invested assets)99%
Yuh0.50% All-in99%
Swissquote 3a Easy0.60% (Savings account with no fees)75%
Descartes0.61% – 0.76% (since August 2026)100%
Inyova0.80% All-in100%

Total costs excluding target fund charges for property funds. Several providers incorporate an indirect Swiss property fund into strategies under 99% equities. Depending on the unit, this adds around 0.03% to 0.07% per year.

The most important pillar 3a providers in a direct duel

finpension, VIAC and frankly dominate the digital pillar 3a market in Switzerland. Here are the key differences between the three top providers.

finpension vs VIAC: the most important differences

finpension vs VIAC in direct comparison
Criterion finpension VIAC
Fees0.39% - 0.42%up to approx. 0.44%
Max. Share quota99%99%
WEF advance withdrawalCHF 250CHF 300
Fund classesInstitutional IPF tranchesCSIF and Swisscanto pension funds
Special featureCrypto admixture up to 5%, no FX premiumMortgage Coupling Bank WIR

finpension has structurally lower fees and access to institutional IPF tranches. Over decades, this can mean a four- to five-figure yield advantage. VIAC is the only provider to offer a mortgage partnership with the WIR bank: anyone who deposits their 3a as collateral receives SARON conditions. Both run via regulated investment foundations, and both allow up to five pots for staggered withdrawals.

VIAC vs frankly: the main differences

VIAC vs frankly in direct comparison
Criterion VIAC frankly
Feesup to approx. 0.44%0.43% All-in fee
Max. Share quota99%95%
WEF advance withdrawalCHF 300free of charge
Investment FoundationTerzo (Bank WIR)Savings 3 (ZKB)
Special featureMortgage Coupling Bank WIRZKB Pension Foundation

frankly is the only top provider to offer a free WEF advance withdrawal. This remains a real advantage when buying your own home. In addition, frankly operates via the ZKB's Sparen 3 pension foundation. As a cantonal bank, ZKB enjoys a special status, but this does not make 3a assets a normal ZKB account. In return, VIAC has a slightly higher equity exposure, more room for manoeuvre when choosing a strategy and the unique mortgage link with Bank WIR.

finpension vs frankly: the most important differences

finpension vs frankly in direct comparison
Criterion finpension frankly
Fees0.39% - 0.42%0.43% All-in fee
Max. Share quota99%95%
WEF advance withdrawalCHF 250free of charge
Fund classesInstitutional IPF tranchesSwisscanto pension fund
Special featureCrypto admixture up to 5%ZKB Pension Foundation

finpension has very low fees, a very high equity allocation (99%) and access to the institutional IPF tranches, which offer better refunds of US withholding tax. Over a savings period spanning several decades, this really adds up. In contrast, frankly scores points with its free early withdrawal for the World Economic Forum and the established ZKB Sparen 3 pension foundation.

finpension vs findependent: the key differences

finpension vs findependent: a direct comparison
Criterion finpension findependent
Fees0.39% - 0.42%0.29%
Max. Share quota99%99%
WEF advance withdrawalCHF 250CHF 500
Fund classesInstitutional IPF tranchesIPF tranches for the USA and Japan
Special featureSeveral years’ experience, proprietary strategies, crypto up to 5%New since October 2026, with no history of its own as yet

Fees excluding the Swiss property fund’s underlying fund costs. For strategies under 99% equities, the following apply: finpension approx. 0.03%, findependent approx. 0.07%.

findependent offers lower fees, most notably for the 99% shares. finpension, on the other hand, has a longer track record, offers greater freedom in choosing your own strategy and provides a more favourable WEF early withdrawal option. Our tip: You don’t have to choose. Using finpension as your main pension pot and findependent as a second pension fund works well with the tiered structure. Full details in the findependent 3a Test.

Sounds like hundredths. Makes the difference of a mid-range car between the ages of 30 and 65.

Concrete calculation example: Anyone who starts at the age of 30, pays CHF 500 into Pillar 3a every month and achieves a net return of 5% will have Pillar 3a assets of around CHF 570’430 by the age of 65. A provider charging an additional 0.5% per year would cost you around CHF 59,651 in the same scenario – reducing your final balance to CHF 510,779.

But fees are only one aspect. The investment strategy is the other. Let's take a closer look.

A brief overview: finpension stands out for its low fees and a consistent institutional fund structure. frankly scores highly with its free early withdrawal for retirement planning and a straightforward standard solution. VIAC offers the greatest flexibility in terms of individual strategy, as well as a mortgage link to Bank WIR.

The differences in fees between the three providers are now very small. It is therefore worth looking beyond the hundredths of a per cent: at the fund structure used, the service provided, the options for staggered payments, and how you intend to use your Pillar 3a later on.

Pillar 3a fund comparison: investment strategies put to the test

All of the providers listed above offer passive investment strategies. Many studies show that, after taking costs into account, broadly diversified passive strategies often outperform active funds in the long term.

Tip: Frankly offers active investment strategies - but you can also switch to the passive investment strategy when you open your Frankly pillar 3a.

finpension gives you the greatest flexibility: you can choose one of the ready-made strategies or put together your own from over 40 funds, including a small allocation to cryptocurrencies. If you want to take a proactive approach to managing your 3a yourself, this is the perfect place for you.

findependent offers three ready-made investment strategies: «Standard» with 40% Swiss equities, «Global» with 10% and «Switzerland» with 80%. Most equity funds belong to the Swisscanto «Responsible» range, which features sustainability filters. The only option without filters is the bank’s own investment solution comprising 33 funds.

Some solutions in the above comparison of pillar 3a providers offer a sustainable investment strategy.

Sustainable investing sounds good, but on closer inspection it is often not very meaningful. This is because the regulations regarding ESG are not yet very far-reaching in Switzerland. Accordingly, not all sustainability is the same and should always be examined in detail be

Descartes relies on a Balancing strategy and thus differs from traditional portfolios weighted by market capitalisation. This may result in a different distribution of risk and return, but does not guarantee lower losses.

True Wealth offers a Reconciliation of pillar 3a and pillar 3b by enabling users to vote on their discretionary assets via True Wealth’s robo-advisor. Taking such a holistic view of all investments certainly makes sense.

Pillar 3a comparison: The best 3a providers in test 2

Pension funds or ETFs: what’s really in your Pillar 3a

Two 3a providers may track the same global index and charge almost identical fees, but use different fund classes. Whether your strategy involves an ETF, a standard index fund or an institutional pension fund affects how much of the dividends from foreign shares actually reaches you. The differences in fees between the major providers are often just a few hundredths of a per cent these days. That is why the fund structure can be just as important in the long term.

Special pension funds are available only to pension schemes. Thanks to this restricted investor base, they can, depending on the country, benefit from tax relief that is not available in the same way to ordinary ETFs or index funds open to the general public. At Swisscanto, you can recognise such funds by the abbreviation «IPF».

Our analysis of two Swisscanto funds tracking the same foreign equity index shows that the IPF variant outperformed by around 0.3 to 0.4 % per year compared with the standard option. These are historical figures for two specific funds; they do not represent a guaranteed future additional return. Furthermore, the difference only has a proportional impact on a mixed 3a portfolio. Most fee comparisons do not show this difference at all.

What fund structures do the major providers use?
ProviderFund classes used
finpensionin the classic building blocks of the standard strategies offered by Swisscanto and UBS’s institutional pension funds
VIACThe standard strategies mainly comprise institutional funds, whilst individual strategies also offer a choice of ETFs
franklySwisscanto pension funds and investment groups of the Swisscanto investment foundations
findependentSwisscanto index funds with no TER; institutional IPF tranches for US and Japanese equities; standard classes for Europe and emerging markets (Details in the review)
YuhSwisscanto index funds in the NT and NTH1 classes, excluding the IPF tranches compared here

Yuh scores highly for its direct integration of Pillar 3a into a fully-fledged banking app. Which solution is best suited therefore depends not only on the fund structure, but also on fees, strategy, investment options and ease of use.

The table is limited to providers whose fund structure we have been able to verify sufficiently on the basis of publicly available documents or written information provided by the provider.

Here’s how to check with your provider: Open the strategy factsheet and check the fund names and ISINs. At Swisscanto, «IPF» indicates an institutional pension fund. Other fund houses use different designations, but the criterion remains the same: is the fund reserved exclusively for pension schemes?

Our own analysis, as at July 2026 (findependent October 2026), based on publicly available fund data, factsheets and information provided by the providers.

Investment Rageber Switzerland PDF investing beginner tips book ebook switzerland finances beginner

Free eBook: Your Investment Guide 2026!

In the Wealth Letter you get:

  • ✓ 3 specific financial tips every week (3 min read)
  • ✓ Exclusive financial tips & strategies for the practice
  • ✓ Instant bonus: 19-page investment eBook for free (value: CHF 29)

Over 8,000 subscribers are already benefiting. 100% Added value. 0% Spam. Cancellable at any time.

How to get more out of your Pillar 3a

Choosing the right provider is important. But even more important is how you use your Pillar 3a afterwards.

Choose the proportion of shares in your portfolio to suit your investment horizon. Money that you won’t need for many years to come is better able to withstand short-term stock market fluctuations. If, on the other hand, you’re planning to buy a home or retire soon, your investment strategy shouldn’t fluctuate unnecessarily.

Set up several 3a pots. This allows you to withdraw your pension savings in instalments at a later date and reduce the tax rate applied to the payouts. You can find details on pension pots, pension foundations and the WEF in the ‘Expert Tip’ section above.

Don’t just compare the administration fee. Other relevant factors include fund costs, foreign currency fees, the fund classes used, the maximum equity allocation and the costs associated with an early WEF withdrawal.

Make regular payments and make the most of the maximum amount. A standing order ensures that the payment isn’t left until the end of the year. Anyone who makes the annual Maximum amount make full use of it and claim the full tax benefit. Under certain conditions, from 2026 onwards you will also be able to retrospectively fill any contribution gaps that arose from 2025 onwards.

Other pillar 3a providers: Strengths and limitations at a glance

In addition to our main selection, there are other pillar 3a providers that we have reviewed. Each has its own strengths and is better suited to specific use cases than the broad recommendation. Here is a brief overview of the points you should consider when making your choice.

Yuh 3a

Yuh is Swissquote’s banking app. The 3a package was launched in 2023 and costs a flat rate of 0.50% per year. Two points to bear in mind:

  • One 3a pot per person. This means that the staggered withdrawal on retirement cannot be implemented directly.
  • Standard fund classes. Yuh uses Swisscanto index funds in the standard investor classes (NT/NTH1). Providers such as finpension make use of institutional IPF tranches thanks to the investment foundation structure. We explain what this means in the section on fund structure.

Yuh still makes sense for existing Yuh Power users with an all-in-one banking logic. Details in the Yuh experience report.

Swissquote 3a

With «3a Easy», Swissquote offers a Pillar 3a scheme directly within the Swissquote account. Saving is free of charge; the investment strategies cost 0.60% per year. Investments are made in UBS Vitainvest strategy funds. Points to bear in mind when choosing:

  • One 3a account per person. As with Yuh, the staggering is not directly realisable.
  • Equity allocation from 45% to 75%. Anyone looking to invest in up to 99% shares for the long term will find more scope with the digital specialists.
  • Fees higher than those of the leading digital providers.

For existing Swissquote customers who want everything under one roof, 3a Easy remains a convenient solution. For those looking purely to optimise their 3a savings, there are more affordable alternatives. Read more in the Swissquote Review.

Selma Finance 3a

Selma is a digital Swiss wealth manager with robo-advisor logic. The 3a offering is solid and simple to implement. To consider when choosing:

  • One account per person. No graduation possible.
  • Fees 0.64% to 0.90% including ETF costs. Higher than the top digital group.
  • Use index ETFs in Pillar 3a instead of pension funds. These ETFs are not eligible for the withholding tax relief available for pension funds. However, as Selma also holds a high proportion of Swiss assets, the effect is less pronounced than it would be with a purely global portfolio.

Selma remains a valid option for its free asset management product, but there are more favourable alternatives in the 3a area. More in the Selma experience report.

VZ Asset Centre 3a

VZ is primarily an advisory set-up with physical locations throughout Switzerland. Anyone who opens a 3a custody account there pays around 0.68% management fee plus around 0.15% TER, i.e. around 0.83% total costs per year. This puts VZ well ahead of the digital providers.

The added value lies in the personalised advice. Anyone who appreciates and utilises this can justify the higher costs. For pure 3a self-optimisers, the cost-benefit ratio is less attractive.

Zak (Bank Cler) 3a

Bank Cler's Zak app offers a simple 3a solution with a flat fee. Functionally cleanly implemented. Please note when choosing:

  • One 3a account per person. As with Yuh, the staggering is not directly realisable.
  • Limited choice of strategy compared to finpension or VIAC.

A plausible choice for Zak users focussing on maximum simplicity and banking integration. Details about the banking app in the Zak experience report.

Alpian 3a

Alpian is positioning itself as a digital premium bank for wealthy private clients. The 3a offering is relatively new and invests in BlackRock funds with a global or Swiss risk profile.

Currently one 3a account per person, which prevents staggering. The pricing model is designed for customers with larger free assets, which Alpian manages in parallel. As a pure 3a standalone solution, finpension, VIAC or neon are more cost-efficient. More about the digital private bank in the Alpian experience report.

Descartes 3a

Descartes Finance takes a unique approach to investment: the ‘equalisation’ strategy, implemented behind the scenes by the asset manager OLZ. This is complemented by a strong focus on sustainability, which Descartes has maintained long before the ESG hype. Points to consider when making your choice:

  • Fees from 0.61% to 0.76%, i.e. above the leading digital group.
  • Equity allocation up to 100%; can be spread across up to 5 pots.

For anyone who values the balancing approach or the ESG focus, Descartes remains an attractive option. If the sole aim is to minimise fees, there are cheaper alternatives. Details in the Descartes Experience Report.

Inyova 3a

Inyova is one of the most committed sustainability providers in the sector. Anyone wishing to invest their pension savings specifically according to environmental and social criteria, whilst maintaining a clear focus on impact, will find a range of products here that is highly specialised in this area. Points to consider when making your choice:

  • Flat-rate fee of 0.80% per year. The product costs (TER) of the underlying funds are reimbursed in full. All in all, the fee therefore corresponds to the total effective costs.
  • The previous solution, which consisted of a personalised portfolio of individual shares, was replaced by a fund-based structure in 2026. This means that some of the previous level of personalisation is lost, whilst at the same time less capital remains uninvested.
  • «Sustainable» does not necessarily mean «sustainable». It is still worth taking a closer look at the strategy, exclusion criteria and the actual investments.

Anyone looking to make a conscious effort to plan for the future sustainably and who values a consistent impact strategy will find Inyova an exciting alternative. The switch to a fund-based structure has made the investment solution more efficient; however, at 0.80% per year, Inyova is still not among the cheapest digital Pillar 3a providers.

Good to know: Three providers, one engine

Yuh, neon and Glarner Regionalbank do not develop their 3a solution entirely in-house. All three rely behind the scenes on the same infrastructure from Descartes («Pension as a Service»), with the private bank Lienhardt & Partner acting as custodian bank, the simply3a Foundation and Swisscanto index funds.

This only applies to the technical platform, not the investment strategy. Each provider chooses its own approach. It’s good to know if you’re wondering why some 3a apps are so similar.

Top recommendations for 2026

Your key to success! Discover our top recommendations from real testimonials.

Conclusion - The big pillar 3a comparison and test

There is no such thing as the best pillar 3a provider. The choice must always be suit you personally. But there is a clear top group.

finpension, VIAC and frankly dominate the digital 3a market. Anyone looking for a bespoke strategy and a wide range of funds for each investment objective will find that finpension hardly any way around it. Anyone planning to buy their own home benefits from the free WEF at frankly. If you are looking for more strategic room for manoeuvre and mortgage advantages, then VIAC in safe hands.

A new addition is findependent: the lowest fees in this group and funds optimised for withholding tax on US and Japanese equities, though they do not yet have a track record of their own. Whether as a stand-alone solution or as a second pot alongside finpension, it is a strong choice.

More important than choosing the perfect provider: Open several pots, ideally with at least two different pension foundations. This will give you tax flexibility and more options for early withdrawals for home ownership.

Feel free to share your 3a experiences in the comments.

How we compare and test

We test each provider ourselves: we open an account, go through the app and its features, and – depending on the provider – trade with real money or in a demo account. The order in the table reflects our editorial assessment. A star rating based on these four criteria follows.

40 %FeesAll ongoing costs associated with a global equity strategy based on CHF 50,000, plus one-off costs for early withdrawal and transfer.
30 %Investment conceptA bespoke strategy for each objective, broad diversification, index funds, tax efficiency and a high equity allocation.
20 %FlexibilityAccounts for staggered withdrawals, minimum amounts, changes in strategy and freedom of movement.
10 %OperationTen fixed checkpoints, from the opening to the transfer, which are the same for all providers.

Community

We will mention feedback from emails, comments, the Wealth Letter and the forum in the text if it starts to accumulate. It is not representative and does not count towards any points.

Return on investment

We show past returns separately, citing the source. They say little about the future and are therefore not included in our assessment.

Independence

We have partnerships with some providers and receive a commission. This has no influence on the ratings, the order of the list or the «Our Choice» section. No one can buy a place in the table.

Fees reviewed: October 2026 If a figure is missing, it will say «Not yet confirmed». We do not make any estimates.

FAQ on the pillar 3a comparison

From 1 January 2027, the maximum contribution limit under Pillar 3a will rise to CHF 7,373 for people in employment who are members of a pension fund. The previous limit was CHF 7,258. For those without a pension fund, the limit is now up to CHF 36,864, or a maximum of 20% of net income.

In addition, you can fill in any gaps that have arisen since 2025, make a retrospective contribution to Pillar 3a, if you have made no or only small contributions over the course of a year. This allows you to close any pension gaps retrospectively and save on tax.

The equity risk is usually determined depending on your investment period and risk perception, as well as other factors.

Don't worry, the respective pillar 3a securities providers will support you in determining your investment strategy.

"Is there a pillar 3a securities comparison? The securities used are very similar among the providers. Furthermore, the investment strategy can usually be adapted and aligned with a focus (e.g. focus on Switzerland).

This pillar 3a comparison is limited to 3a custody accounts. To keep the test of pillar 3a funds comparatively clear, interest accounts are compared separately. 

Here is a contribution that clarifies whether a custody account, an account or even insurance can be useful for you.

The best place to take out a pillar 3a depends on your personal preferences, circumstances and goals. 

So first make clear exactly what you want with your pillar 3a and then which provider can best serve you.

The best pillar 3a solution that is best for everyone simply does not exist.

A 3a account is interest-bearing, while a securities solution invested in ETFs or funds. This offers higher potential returns, but also entails fluctuations. A traditional account, on the other hand, remains stable, but usually with lower interest income, which is generally lower than inflation.

A Cost-effective solution like pillar 3a are not available on the free market to the same extent, as only the third pillar offers tax advantages. Nevertheless, a Solution like pillar 3a (e.g. ETF portfolio with a robo advisor) if you want access to your money at all times.

That depends on your risk appetite. Those who invest their assets in 3a accounts for the long term often choose a higher Equity share in the Pillar 3a with ETF. If you have security needs, you can access more Bonds set. A good mix can vary depending on your life situation.

At Pillar 3a in comparison pay attention to the Interest rate and the fees. Many offers of a Cantonal Bank also enable fund investments (i.e. Pension fund) or 3a savings accounts. The best way to start is with "Compare interest rates and costs free of charge" on the banks' websites or Moneyland.ch to get a quick overview of the market.

VZ Vermögenszentrum charges around 0.68% management fee plus around 0.15% TER for the securities-linked pillar 3a, totalling around 0.83% total costs per year. This puts VZ well ahead of digital providers such as finpension, VIAC or neon (all below 0.45%). The added value of VZ is the personalised advice with physical locations. Those who actively use this can justify the higher costs. For pure 3a self-optimisers, digital providers are more cost-efficient.

Because sometimes asked, here is the link to the Raiffeisen Rio 3a test report and to the Vontobel Volt 3a test.

Yes, Kassensturz has tested various 3a providers. The results confirm what our Schwiizerfranke test also shows: digital providers such as finpension, Viac and Frankly perform significantly better than traditional bank products thanks to lower fees. As of December 2025.

For most investors, I recommend finpension (lowest fees at 0.39%) or Viac (best app and flexibility). Important: A pure 3a savings account is hardly worthwhile due to low interest rates – opt for a securities solution. In my test, opening an account with all the top providers took less than 10 minutes.

61 responses
  1. Hello, Eric,

    Thank you very much for running this website!

    I have a question about my situation: I am 30, German, hold a B residence permit, and am starting my first job as a junior doctor in January.
    Does Pillar 3a make sense for me? I could, after all, claim it as a tax deduction via a retrospective withholding tax assessment.
    In the long run, I plan to marry my girlfriend (who is Swiss) and, at some point, apply for a Swiss passport.
    Does this change my pension strategy?

    And if you were to do something completely different, please do let me know.

    Warmest regards, Basti

    1. Hi Basti,

      With withholding tax, the situation regarding Section 3a is completely different. Don’t make the same mistake I did back then (on the advice of a tax adviser)… As there are a few details to bear in mind, please read this article.
      I hope you have a lovely start to January!
      Dear greetings
      Eric

  2. Why is ‘true wealth’ not included in many comparisons and is only mentioned in passing?
    In terms of performance and fees, TW can certainly beat many well-known providers…
    It would be great if all the really cheap providers were compared against one another.

    1. Thanks for your input!

      True Wealth is included in the comparison, in the main comparison table and in the
      The fee overview is right at the top. You’ll find better value at
      a securities solution is not currently available.

      There are two reasons why TW is missing from the detailed comparisons: space and demand.
      The debates have emerged from readers’ questions and comments, and it is there that
      finpension, VIAC and frankly are most often compared against one another. That is
      Not a judgement, but simply what is most in demand.

      We’ll be happy to add True Wealth in the next update. Until then
      You can find the details in the review:
      https://www.schwiizerfranke.com/true-wealth-saeule-3a-erfahrungen

      Kind regards
      Eric

  3. Hello Eric

    I was just wondering why Swissquote isn’t on the list? With fees of 0.6%, Swissquote is definitely in the running too…

    Best wishes, Joh

    1. Hello Joh
      Good point – there are, of course, (a great many) 3a providers; the table is driven not only by the market but also by the community.
      Swissquote 3a won’t make it into the table at the moment, but I’ll have a look to see where we can include it in the comparison. Thanks for your input!

  4. Hello, I'm missing a pillar 3a account that also takes sustainability criteria / ESG into account. That would be worth comparing 😉 or does anyone here have any tips?

    1. Hello Verena,
      Some of the providers have the option of choosing an ESG focus. Some pure ESG offerings have disappeared from the market entirely because they did not perform well (e.g. Freya 3a)

  5. Hey Eric,
    Great overview! Two important points could be added:
    1. foreign currency fees (FWR):
    VIAC incurs FWR, finpension does not. This can be strategically interesting: use VIAC for CHF investments, finpension for global investments - this avoids unnecessary currency costs.
    Source: https://finpension.ch/de/wissen/beste-saeule-3a/
    2. bitcoin exposure:
    finpension is currently the only pillar 3a provider with a Bitcoin option (TER 0.25%). For all those who want crypto exposure in their tax-privileged 3a assets.
    Source: https://finpension.ch/de/saeule-3a-investieren/indexinstrumente/
    Depending on the investment strategy, these differences can be decisive!

    1. Thanks for the addition, Simon - they're very valuable!
      Regarding Bitcoin: This is now also possible with VIAC.

  6. Hello Eric

    I would just like to say a big compliment – I am a fan of your website. It is very informative and clearly laid out, with excellent tips 🙂 in various categories! A big thank you for putting so much effort into this website and keeping it up to date!

    One more comment on 3a: I am curious to see what findependent will deliver starting this summer.

  7. Hello Eric
    Thanks to your Autopilot course, I am finally optimising my finances – a really great course, thank you very much! A question about 3a: I have a normal 3a account with 57,000 at a bank, which is no longer being topped up. In addition, I (unfortunately!!!) took out a 3a policy with a fund at Mobiliar, which I can't get out of after doing some research, or rather, it's no longer worthwhile due to my age (54). Does it make sense to reduce the amounts at Mobiliar to £100/month and put the rest into staggered pots, e.g. at True Wealth? And does it make sense to transfer the entire normal 3a account to True Wealth?

    Thank you very much.
    Best regards, Soli

    1. Thank you very much for your feedback on the Autopilot Course, Cheers!
      3a policies are a tricky thing. Especially when it comes to mixed life insurance. I have written a detailed article on this topic here: 3a Keep the policy or not?

      At 54, you theoretically still have a good investment horizon until you reach normal retirement age, allowing you to invest in shares as part of a balanced strategy. Providers such as True Wealth etc. can help you design your investment strategy. Leaving the money in an account for another 10 years would be an expensive decision.
      But you have to make the decision yourself; I'm not allowed to give you investment advice here 🙂
      The easiest way is to open a free account with a provider of your choice and enter your situation there once. You will then receive a possible suggestion, which you can then review for yourself.

      Does that help you?
      Best regards and good luck,
      Eric

  8. Hi Eric
    I have a question about your pro tip "You can purchase pots from different providers / pension schemes more than once for a WEF within 5 years. (If you have everything with one provider, you can only do one WEF every 5 years)."

    Let's say my goal is to buy my own home in 2030 and I want to do a WEF.
    Example 1:
    - Two 3a investment accounts with Frankly with CHF 40,000 each.
    - I can withdraw the entire CHF 80,00 directly in 2030 (or just part of it). 5 years later, I could withdraw the newly paid-in money again.
    Example 2:
    - A 3a investment account with Frankly with CHF 40,000 and a 3a investment account with finpension with CHF 40,000
    - Can I receive the money from Frankly and finpension for the WEF in the same year?
    - What is the advantage of drawing the CHF 40,000 from Frankly in 2030 and then, for example, the CHF 40,000 from Finpension in 2032? I would have to take out the mortgage in 2030. Would this be for new investments in my own home, such as a new heating system or photovoltaic system?

    Are there any other points to consider for married persons?

    1. Yes, you can make several WEF withdrawals from different 3a providers (or pension funds) within 5 years - the blocking period applies per provider, not in total.
      In concrete terms, this means that if you have an account with frankly and finpension, for example, you can draw on both in the same year or staggered over time. Whether a staggered withdrawal makes sense depends heavily on your financing situation - in practice, when buying a house, the bank usually wants the entire equity amount at the time of closing. Individual later withdrawals can then only be used for renovations or larger investments.
      For married couples, each person has their own 3a accounts and can make separate early withdrawals.

  9. Hello Eric

    First of all, a big compliment for the very informative and comprehensible content on your website.

    I have a 3rd pillar A account with UBS with a balance of over CHF 30,000. This money is held there like in a traditional savings account. Since the beginning of this year, I have also had a second 3a account with VIAC, into which I pay monthly and which is invested in ETFs.

    Now I would also like to invest the assets with UBS, but not directly with UBS, partly because of the fee structure.
    Is it possible to transfer this 3a account to another provider (e.g. Truth Wealth) and gradually invest the amount there?

    Thank you in advance for your feedback!
    Kind regards
    Rahel

    1. Dear Rahel,
      Thank you very much for your great feedback!
      Yes, you can move the 3a assets without any problems. Your new provider will usually provide you with good support.
      You can only ever transfer whole pots. You can invest gradually, for example, by choosing a conservative strategy (e.g. with Finpension, TW etc.) and then gradually increasing the equity risk.

      Good luck!
      (No investment recommendation)

  10. Hello,

    As a person with a B permit, I honestly don't see any advantage in investing in pillar 3a - or am I wrong?
    As far as I understand it, you can't file a regular tax return with a B permit unless you earn over CHF 120,000.
    Without a tax return, however, you cannot deduct the payment into the 3a from your taxable income, which is actually the main advantage of this pillar.
    And what particularly bothers me is that the credit balance is still taxed when it is later withdrawn - as a so-called capital benefit (approx. 5-10 % depending on the canton).
    In concrete terms, this means
    The money has already been fully taxed once (because no 3a deduction was possible),
    and has to pay taxes again later when he receives it.
    This feels like a kind of "double taxation" to me
    Or have I overlooked something?

    1. Hello Helena,
      You are absolutely right! Or rather, it depends: Income level, canton, etc. play a role in the decision.
      However, pillar 3a is not worthwhile across the board and especially not always for foreigners.

      Pillar 3a + voluntary tax return for B permits can be a very expensive mistake, which I made myself - and my tax advisor at the time let me walk straight into it.
      So that this doesn't happen to you and others: Here is a Important contribution for all foreigners with a B permit.

      1. Hello, Eric,
        but as a cross-border commuter with a B permit (e.g. residence in Switzerland with gainful employment in FL) you can deduct the 3a again, right?
        Best regards, Chai

  11. Hello Eric
    Could providers such as PostFinance be of interest in the 3a pillar comparison as they have no fees, or am I making a mistake?

    1. Hello David,
      For long-term investors in pillar 3a, PostFinance is not an optimal choice despite the free basic account. The total costs (for the funds etc.) of 0.9-1.4% p.a. are significantly higher than with digital providers such as finpension, frankly or Viac, for example, which allow almost 100% equity exposure with only 0.4-0.5% fees. In the long term, this difference amounts to several tens of thousands of francs.

  12. Hello dear Eric,

    Thank you for your good content.

    I read your newsletter today with the 4Profi 3a tips.

    I have a very important comment here regarding timing, from an experience I have had myself:

    I always paid in the full amount at the beginning of the year for 3 years.
    As a result, it took just as long to bring the negative performance back into positive territory. (Corona 2020, Ukraine war etc. were decisive factors here)

    Accordingly, I would recommend paying in monthly for investments over 40-50% to even out the fluctuations.

    For a bank without an investment, the strategy can make perfect sense.

    1. Hello Marcel

      Thank you very much for your valuable advice! In my Newsletter I had recommended paying in the full 3a contribution at the beginning of January if possible, in order to make the most of the interest earned during the year and the compound interest effect.

      However, you are absolutely right that in times of market uncertainty a staggered deposit can be useful to reduce the timing risk.

      With pillar 3a, as with equity investments in general, you should always plan with a long-term investment horizon anyway. Over many years or decades, short-term market fluctuations tend to even out, which mitigates the timing effect somewhat.

      Thank you for sharing this important perspective with us!

      Kind regards
      Eric

  13. What strategy should you choose if you are already 42 years old? My child is grown up and has completed her education. I am divorced and working. No home ownership.
    High risk, with a high equity component?

    1. Hello Nadja
      the 3a tools support you with this question when you open the account.
      I can't give you any advice here, you need more information.

      But in general: you should only choose a 100% equity strategy if you don't need the money +10. In the 3a, it doesn't always have to be retirement; after all, early withdrawal is also possible.
      The easiest way to do this is to use the support provided by your 3a solution, where you will be asked a few questions during onboarding and then receive an investment proposal.

      1. Hi Eric
        I am 57 and have four accounts with VIAC. Two of them have a share allocation of 100% and two have an allocation of 80%. I plan to withdraw funds in stages from the age of 60 until I reach normal retirement age at 65. The question now is whether I should reduce my share allocation.

        1. Hello Vinzenz,
          Thank you for your interesting question. I cannot answer it directly, as that would constitute investment advice. What I would do personally is reduce the risk gradually and with sufficient foresight, i.e. lower the proportion of shares. Even if the money is subsequently invested elsewhere (from retirement age onwards), a sale must still take place in the 3a account, which is why I would personally reduce the risk gradually each year.
          But that may not always be the best option. After all, there could still be significant performance gains in those years, and we will only know in hindsight what the best strategy was. The safest option is definitely to reduce the risk in advance. Does that help?

  14. Hi,
    Is it also possible to invest completely individually in ETFs or index funds? In other words, I don't just want to choose a "strategy", but also decide which product I want to invest in each month, for example?

    Are there providers for this and is it even permitted (state regulation)?

    Thanks!

    1. Hello Elisabeth
      Some providers allow the strategy to be customised. However, there are of course severe restrictions here and it is not possible to choose completely freely. In my opinion, this is a good thing for most people 🙂
      You are only completely free in "3b", i.e. in free assets

  15. Hi Eric, when you write that it makes sense to choose different 3a providers, I think it's easy to decide which one to choose. One account each with Finpensio, Frankly, Viac, TrueWealth and a 5th and possibly 6th of your choice. Perhaps an insurance solution could also be considered. Have I got that right?
    Greetings Michel

    1. Hello Michel,
      under no circumstances! I wouldn't recommend an insurance solution in the 3a. If you need insurance, it's better to take it out in the free area, then you'll be flexible and can cancel it when you no longer need it.

  16. Hoi Eric,
    I have a quick question about Yuh. There is also a pillar 3a solution with fees of 0.5% per year. There are also 5 risk levels, whereby the one with 99% shares makes the most sense in my opinion. As I have my account with Yuh, I find the solution quite practical and the fees are comparable. Have you looked into it? Are there any disadvantages?
    Thank you and best regards Matthias

    1. Hello Matthias,
      If you are already with Yuh, that is of course a great advantage.
      The fees could be lower, but they are fair. Overall, the solution is exciting, but there are also Yuh 3a disadvantages:
      Currency hedging cannot be cancelled and must therefore always be paid for. If you don't want to invest sustainably, you can't switch it off either. And the strategies are unfortunately not customisable - if that is desired at all.

  17. Dear Eric, does it make sense to make a 3a WEF advance withdrawal even though I don't need it? I could already make a staggered withdrawal.

    Kind regards

    1. Hello Walmona,
      Do you mean in the 5 years before the ordinary pension? Depending on your tax situation, this definitely makes sense as a rule. Here is a Article to that.
      Before this deadline, early withdrawals are only possible under certain circumstances (e.g. owning a home, self-employment, leaving Switzerland) and these are also closely scrutinised.

  18. Hello, Eric,

    I would like to know if you can make a declaration on taxation at retirement age? I thought capital gains from ETFs are tax-free in Switzerland, why do you have to pay tax on them when you retire?

    Is it not also more sensible to take out a global ETF savings plan via a broker in order to access the capital invested at any time? (As far as I know, capital gains are also tax-free here & the fees can be lower than with e.g. Frankly pillar 3a)

    1. Hello Pascal! In principle, capital gains from ETFs are tax-free in Switzerland as long as you hold them as part of your private assets. However, the situation is different when paying out pillar 3a, in which ETFs can also be invested. In this case, it is not the capital gain that is taxed, but the entire capital saved, as it is considered pension capital.

      A global ETF savings plan via a broker naturally offers you more flexibility, as you can access the capital at any time. The tax treatment and fee structure can indeed be more favourable here. However, the tax advantages of pillar 3a are not available.

  19. In my opinion, Frankly was and is a pioneer in online 3a solutions. Simple and clear. Above all, it's good for the vast majority of users that you don't have an infinite number of options and settings, as this can quickly become overwhelming. The performance is also good. So with frankly you can regularly deposit a chunk and sleep well. Time will do the rest. What more could you want?
    Oh, maybe a starting discount...? With this code, frankly is currently offering us a few francs.

  20. Hello Eric
    Thank you very much for the free guidebook.
    I was cheated again until I had no more money.
    The Luzerner Kantonalbank blocked me and made sure that I received a guardianship from the Kesb.
    I got a good man who pays all my bills with my AHV pension.
    Kind regards from Leo

  21. Hello everybody

    About 3 years ago I was persuaded by an adviser to take out my 3a with Pax. I have been paying in full since then. Since I've been looking more closely at my finances recently, I can't find the information I need to find out whether this was the right decision...
    Can you please help me with this???

  22. Congratulations Eric on your great site. I've already learnt a lot there.
    I use 3a from True Wealth and am very satisfied. The app is also very user-friendly and clearly organised. I also find it perfect that it is automatically divided into 5 accounts without me having to worry about it.
    I also use True Wealth for my "free" investments (and also for my wife and the children's portfolios). I'm also very happy with this and think it's great that the strategy for 3a and free assets is identical.

    If you want to benefit from only 0.25% asset management fee for 1 year (save 44%) you are welcome to use the link when opening!

  23. Hello Eric

    First of all, a big compliment and thank you for your homepage and the comprehensible financial reports. 😃

    My question: I am considering opening a 3a account with TW. In your table you state that the minimum investment amount is CHF 1. On the TW homepage, however, it says that the minimum deposit is CHF 1000. What applies now or am I confusing something?

    Greetings Stefan

    1. Hello Stefan
      Thank you very much for your good feedback!
      And thank you very much for pointing this out - True Wealth has probably adjusted it! Initially it was CHF 1, but now I can confirm that it has risen to CHF 1000 for pillar 3a.
      Presumably because otherwise the costs would be too high for them in percentage terms.

      I have adjusted the post, thanks to your info 🙂
      Dear greetings
      Eric

  24. Dear Eric
    Thank you very much for your great work! I always consult your site with great benefit before making my financial decisions. Right now I'm in the process of opening another 3a pillar. Although it will still be around 10 years before I start liquidating the pillars, I would be interested to know not only the running costs but also the fees that will be incurred on withdrawal. For older people like me, this would also be a decision criterion that could be useful in your overview.
    Best regards

    1. Dear Franziska,
      Thank you very much for your positive feedback! I'm particularly pleased to receive news like this 🙂
      Regarding your question: I am not aware of any fees that are due for the regular liquidation of pillar 3a custody accounts. The situation is different for early withdrawals for home ownership promotion; you can find information on this in the table above.

      If your question was also about taxes, these depend largely on your income. Accordingly, you should make the withdrawal in stages, as described here.
      Best regards and see you soon,
      Eric

  25. I read an analysis on true wealth 3a at thepoorswiss. In fact, the asset allocation of a 99% equity strategy does not seem optimal to me. Too much Europe, too little USA, etc. Stamp duty on ETFs and dividend withholding

    What do you think about these points?

    Thomas

    1. Hello, Thomas,
      Thank you very much for your input and the advice.
      This is where opinions differ! I cannot go into this sufficiently in a commentary, but this much can be said:
      If you take the last 20 years and compare the net return of the SPI vs. the S&P500, at first glance the US index wins. But not if you look correctly and take into account the currency loss, because the dollar lost value against the franc. In net and currency-adjusted terms, the SPI did better for us Swiss.

      There are TOP economists who deliberately focus on Switzerland and there are TOP economists who nevertheless strongly overweight international stocks. We only know what the past has brought, but not 100%ig what the future will bring. I am therefore reluctant to go out on a limb...

      I hope this helps you a little?
      Kind regards
      Eric

  26. Greetings Eric
    Thank you for your interesting tips on pillar 3a. I have learned a lot, even though I have had a Pillar 3a account for over 10 years. (I've been with Frankly for just under 1.5 years).

    But what I don't understand is the WEF (
    Home ownership promotion).
    What is it exactly, what do I need it for?
    With some providers this is free, with others between 250-400chf.
    Is free good or bad?
    How should I understand this?
    Thank you

    1. Dear Andre
      thank you for your positive message 🙂

      A WEF is only relevant for you if you want to promote home ownership with pension assets.
      You can use money from your pension fund (2nd pillar) or from pillar 3a for owner-occupied residential property.
      Since we are talking about 3a in this post:

      The various 3a providers usually charge fees for such an advance withdrawal. So "free" is good, here the fees are more or less already paid and included in the all-in-fee.
      If you plan to make several early withdrawals from pillar 3a, you should of course take any fees into account.

      Love!
      Eric

  27. Hello, Eric,
    When you write "Build up your 3a assets in several 3a pots in order to be able to draw on the individual pillars in stages later on" do you mean in parallel, i.e. pay in e.g. 2000.00 per year at the same time or one after the other as soon as an amount of e.g. 30,000.00 is reached?
    Many thanks and big compliments to this blog and the many explanations and tips!
    Dear greetings, Iris

    1. Hello Iris,
      Thank you very much for your great feedback 🙂 I am very happy about that.
      There are different strategies to fill your 3a pots. The most common is to open successive pots (e.g. open a new pot every CHF 30,000).
      However, you can also, for example, open several pots from the beginning (e.g. 5 pots) and use these Parallel by standing order fill. Although this involves more work, it also has advantages depending on the investment objective, as described above.
      As described, it can also be advantageous to spread your Pillar 3a pots over several providers and thus investment foundations (e.g. Frankly, Finpension, Viac, ...).

      There are many different ways to reach the desired goal. The question is simply what your goal is, what is best suited for it and what effort you are willing to put into it.

      Regardless of whether you are saving for a WEF or for a regular retirement in pillar 3a, it is essential to build up several pots in order to be able to approach the withdrawal intelligently from a tax perspective later on, and draw staggered to be able

      Best wishes and good luck 🙂
      Eric

Write a comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked with * marked.

Cover: Pension Guide – Planning for the Future with Peace of Mind

Free Pension-Guide

Planning for the future with peace of mind

12 pages with a self-assessment test. Find out where you’re missing out when it comes to 3a, your pension fund and your benefits.

  • The self-assessment: 8 questions that reveal your knowledge gaps
  • Catching up on 3a shortfalls and receiving payments in instalments
  • Pension scheme contributions: the rule that many only learn about too late

The guide will be sent to you as a PDF via email. You will then receive the Wealth Letter every Wednesday. You can unsubscribe at any time.