What is securities lending? The car park example
To explain securities lending, imagine the following scenario:
You park your expensive car (your securities) in a garage. You pay the garage owner (your broker) a small fee for parking your car. The terms of use state that the garage owner may lend your car to other people for a fee when you are not using it - but many customers overlook this or do not fully understand it.
What exactly happens?
- The garage owner earns CHF 50 per month from your car
- He might give you CHF 5 per month as a "share"
- As security, the borrower places a scooter worth CHF 55,000 in the garage (for a car worth CHF 50,000)
The hidden risk:
A "Black Swan" event happens - the borrower has a serious accident with your car and files for bankruptcy. At the same time, the market for scooters crashes and your "110% security" is suddenly only worth CHF 15,000. Your CHF 50,000 car is gone and you are left with a massive loss - for a paltry CHF 5 per month "additional income".
Securities lending works in practically the same way in the financial world:
- Your broker lends your Shares or ETFs to other market participants
- They usually use these for short selling or complex trading strategies
- You receive a (usually small) portion of the lending fee as "passive income" or, for example, free custody fees
- The borrower deposits collateral (typically 102-110% of the value)
Thanks for the article on securities lending!
🙂
Hello Eric
Thank you for the detailed article. What is also worth mentioning: According to a brief search, securities lending is activated by default with certain brokers (Degiro and Interactive Brokers), i.e. if you do not want this, you have to deactivate this option manually (opt-out).
With other brokers (Swissquote, Saxo), however, it must be consciously activated (opt-in).
Hello Eric
Most ETFs also do securities lending, would you also avoid them?
MFG Kili
Hello Kili,
That's a very good question! You raise an important point, because most large ETFs do in fact engage in securities lending themselves.
In the case of ETFs, however, securities lending differs from securities lending via brokers in a number of important respects:
Better hedging: ETF providers such as iShares, Vanguard or UBS typically require overcollateralisation of 102-110% of the value lent.
Limited shares: The major providers tend to lend only a controlled portion of their portfolio - for example, with Vanguard FTSE All-World it is often under 5%, with iShares Core ETFs it varies between 0.5-15%.
Income return: Unlike with many brokers, some of the income flows back into the ETF (with Vanguard even 100% after costs), which benefits all investors.
This practice is standard for almost all major ETF providers, not just for niche products. There are also special "non-lending" ETFs for investors who want to avoid securities lending altogether - although these are in the minority and sometimes somewhat more expensive.
Personally, I see securities lending with reputable ETF providers as less problematic than with brokers, as transparency is higher and security standards are stricter.
I have added a paragraph on ETF securities lending to the article.
Best regards
Eric
Ciao Eric
Thank you for your answer.
Gerd Kommer even sees some advantages with ETFs that do securities lending.
For the people who are interested, here is the link.
https://gerd-kommer.de/wertpapierleihe-bei-etfs/
Greetings
Kili