To provide you with an optimised experience, we use technologies such as cookies to store and/or access device information. If you consent to these technologies, we may process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this website. If you do not give or withdraw your consent, certain features and functions may be impaired.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service expressly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences not requested by the subscriber or user.
Technical storage or access for statistical purposes only.
Technical storage or access used solely for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, the voluntary consent of your Internet service provider or additional records from third parties, the information stored or accessed for this purpose alone cannot generally be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is necessary to create user profiles, to send advertising or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Small correction: you cannot deduct the CHF 6,883 from your taxes, but from your taxable income.
Furthermore, the BVG only insures salaries up to CHF 60,945. A non-compulsory solution would therefore have to be sought in order to insure CHF 150,000.
Here, the costs of a BVG solution are much higher than with the large pillar 3a. Plus, you can't invest as aggressively as you might like.
Thank you for your comment regarding taxable income!
Correct, the BVG compulsory insurance starts at CHF 21,510 and extends up to the upper limit of CHF 60,945. If you choose a PF solution and want to insure above the upper limit, you choose a non-compulsory solution.
In the linked article from VZ, it is shown that for high incomes, the tax savings including costs with this solution are very attractive. The costs you mentioned would therefore be exciting to consider in combination with the tax savings overall.
Generally speaking, it can be said that the PF offers far fewer opportunities for individual adjustment of the investment strategy compared with Pillar 3a.